· 3 min read

Why Most Home Rental Apps Don’t Succeed in Zambia

Many property apps built in Zambia work technically, yet few succeed. A software engineer's view on adoption, incentives and existing habits.

I’ve seen a lot of property and real estate apps built in Zambia over the years. And technically, many of them are perfectly fine. You can add a property. You can search for one. You can filter by price. You can view photos and videos. You can contact someone about it. The basic functionality is usually there. But many of these platforms never really stick. I don’t think the problem is that they aren’t useful. I think the bigger challenge is culture.

Whenever you introduce a product into an industry where people already have an established way of doing business, your product has to do one of two things:

  1. Fit into the existing culture. OR

  2. Create a new one.

The second option is much harder than it sounds. Because now you’re not just building software. You’re trying to change how people behave. Take the property market. There are roughly three parties you have to think about: landlords, agents and tenants/buyers. And each of them already has a way of doing things.

Landlords

A landlord may not feel a strong need for another platform. They can post a home on Facebook, WhatsApp groups or hand it over to an agent and wait for inquiries. So when you build a rental app, what is the compelling reason for a landlord to change what already works for them?

Agents

Agents might have more to gain. A platform could help them advertise properties, organize listings and potentially reach more customers. But there’s a chicken-and-egg problem. Why should agents upload their best properties to your platform if you don’t already have an audience? Maybe incentives solve part of that. Perhaps agents get commissions. Perhaps they pay a subscription. Perhaps listings are free initially. Perhaps you give them tools that make managing properties much easier.

But then you have another problem: How do you make sure agents actually get paid when a transaction happens? How do you prevent people from discovering a property through the platform and completing the transaction outside it?

Tenants and buyers

This is probably where the value proposition can become much stronger. Someone looking for home wants convenience. They want enough listings. They want accurate information. They want good photos. They want to know whether a home is still available. And perhaps most importantly, they want to avoid being scammed.

If a platform can create trust and aggregate enough legitimate properties in one place, that becomes genuinely valuable. But again, you need the properties first. And to get the properties, you need landlords and agents. That’s why I think building a successful property platform in Zambia is less of a software problem and more of a marketplace, incentives and behavior-change problem.

The development itself might actually be the easiest part

You can build the listings. You can build search. You can build accounts. You can build messaging. You can build payments.

But code alone doesn’t create the marketplace.

You may have to spend years educating users, onboarding agents manually, verifying properties, building trust, running promotions, creating incentives and sometimes literally going into the market and showing people why they should use the product.

That requires patience and capital.

It’s also why bootstrapping something like this could be difficult. A significant amount of the investment may have to go into distribution, operations and changing behavior rather than development. And I don’t think Zambia necessarily has a technology adoption problem. We’ve already seen people adopt products such as Yango , Airbnb that have homes and other digital services when the benefit is obvious enough.

The key phrase there is: the benefit has to be obvious. A rental property platform can’t simply be Facebook Marketplace with nicer filters. It has to solve a painful enough problem that landlords, agents and tenants are willing to change the way they already operate. That’s the interesting challenge.

As a developer, I find the space fascinating. I could probably build the software relatively quickly. But I personally wouldn’t rush to build one. Not because of the engineering involved, but because I understand how much work would have to happen outside the codebase for it to succeed.

I’m curious to see who eventually figures this market out and manages to dominate it. For people working in real estate, proptech or marketplaces in Zambia:

What do you think is actually missing?

  • Better technology?

  • More properties?

  • Trust and verification?

  • Agent incentives?

  • Or is the real challenge changing how the industry already works?

Have a problem like this?

Tell me what you're trying to solve, your timeline and any constraints. I reply within two working days.